GB News - Printable Version
+- Pres Café (https://pres.cafe)
+-- Forum: Pres Café TV and Radio Forums (https://pres.cafe/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: News and Sport Presentation (https://pres.cafe/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: GB News (/showthread.php?tid=29)
+- Pres Café (https://pres.cafe)
+-- Forum: Pres Café TV and Radio Forums (https://pres.cafe/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: News and Sport Presentation (https://pres.cafe/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: GB News (/showthread.php?tid=29)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
RE: GB News - freeview87 - 14-06-2023
I had little faith two years ago and ironic that on their second birthday they proved,to me anyway, that they can cover a major developing story in the UK well.
The coverage was measured in most parts (daytime), with various live reports, discussing a variety of possibilities and generally keeping on top of what was coming in.
RE: GB News - Daveuk - 14-06-2023
(06-06-2023, 08:37 PM):DPWD Wrote: Ooops, bombshell blooper by GB News here.... https://twitter.com/gamray/status/1665998168813699074?t=YglBnU86wo04fzev6BvuWg&s=19
Just caught up with this… best bit has to be the scream you hear after f bomb!
RE: GB News - Scrotnig - 14-06-2023
(14-06-2023, 11:26 AM)freeview87 Wrote: I had little faith two years ago and ironic that on their second birthday they proved,to me anyway, that they can cover a major developing story in the UK well.I agree. I mean, I will admit I like GB News, but I’m not blind to their shortcomings.
The coverage was measured in most parts (daytime), with various live reports, discussing a variety of possibilities and generally keeping on top of what was coming in.
I wasn’t expecting them to handle the Nottingham incident as well they did, but it was indeed very good (as was Sky).
BBC was the letdown here I am very sad to say. Not terrible, but not as good as I expected.
RE: GB News - Toby brown - 14-06-2023
Jason Gardiner has just said Phillip Schofield"s lovers first name on gb news is that allowed?
RE: GB News - TVViewer256 - 14-06-2023
(14-06-2023, 10:35 PM)Toby brown Wrote: Jason Gardiner has just said Phillip Schofield"s lovers first name on gb news is that allowed?I don’t believe there’s anything stopping anyone from using it but it’s in very poor taste.
RE: GB News - TJTSW - 14-06-2023
(14-06-2023, 10:35 PM)Toby brown Wrote: Jason Gardiner has just said Phillip Schofield"s lovers first name on gb news is that allowed?
Its GB News, as Long as he didnt mention his surname I guess they could just about get away with it
RE: GB News - derek500 - 14-06-2023
Jim Davidson just mentioned his ex-wife (he's had several), then I remembered he used to be married to Alison Holloway, who was the original presenter of Sky World News Tonight with the great Scott Chisholm.
RE: GB News - Andrew - 14-06-2023
(14-06-2023, 10:35 PM)Toby brown Wrote: Jason Gardiner has just said Phillip Schofield"s lovers first name on gb news is that allowed?
Did Wootton shut him down or secretly get excited as his name being made public would make this story, which is flagging everywhere else except GB News, get going again
RE: GB News - Larry the Loafer - 14-06-2023
(14-06-2023, 10:35 PM)Toby brown Wrote: Jason Gardiner has just said Phillip Schofield"s lovers first name on gb news is that allowed?
I don't think there's any official injuction in place to prevent identifying him, just that most of the media have chosen not to in an effort to protect his privacy, even if it does only take a matter of seconds to find it out yourself.
RE: GB News - gottago - 15-06-2023
I’m pretty sure the press have avoided naming him in case it’s later found out he was the victim of a sexual offence, in which case he has the right to anonymity for life. I highly doubt it’s just to protect his privacy, the tabloid press normally have no interest in protecting that.
So yes in that case GB News have broken that anonymity.