Pres Café
BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) - Printable Version

+- Pres Café (https://pres.cafe)
+-- Forum: Pres Café TV and Radio Forums (https://pres.cafe/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: News and Sport Presentation (https://pres.cafe/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) (/showthread.php?tid=412)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644


RE: BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) - ginnyfan - 07-12-2023

I wouldn't put Simon's paper-tablet stunt in the same category as greeting your viewers with a middle finger. If this is supposed to be acceptable, and not cause ''outrage'' or fuss, then what's stopping Christian Fraser from mooning the viewers at the start of The Context tonight??? Maybe we should accept that as well, if it's just him having some fun, at work, with his colleagues. Rolleyes 

Once again, I don't think Moshiri should be fired, replaced or anything like that. Suspension or some sort of warning will probably happen since the story has gone international now and BBC is already under a lot of pressure from all sides. But there are certain rules and ways to behave at the work place, especially if you're working on tv and broadcasting to hundreds of thousands around the world. There is a special responsibility this job carries with it. Most news presentes seem to understand this.


RE: BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) - Skygeek - 07-12-2023

(07-12-2023, 01:39 PM)ginnyfan Wrote:  I wouldn't put Simon's paper-tablet stunt in the same category as greeting your viewers with a middle finger. If this is supposed to be acceptable, and not cause ''outrage'' or fuss, then what's stopping Christian Fraser from mooning the viewers at the start of The Context tonight??? Maybe we should accept that as well, if it's just him having some fun, at work, with his colleagues. Rolleyes 

Once again, I don't think Moshiri should be fired, replaced or anything like that. Suspension or some sort of warning will probably happen since the story has gone international now and BBC is already under a lot of pressure from all sides. But there are certain rules and ways to behave at the work place, especially if you're working on tv and broadcasting to hundreds of thousands around the world. There is a special responsibility this job carries with it. Most news presentes seem to understand this.

Sanctimonious drivel. And you still haven't answered my question as to how you know she wanted it to go viral.

Because you don't. Because confected outrage is more fun.


RE: BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) - leewilliams - 07-12-2023

I’ll dare to tread a middle way here.

Calls for Maryam to be suspended (or worse) are clearly way over the top - a reminder from a manager about expected studio etiquette will suffice.

But sticking a finger up at a camera in a live studio speaks to something I’ve written about here before - a general impression that ever since the changes, the NC’s adopted this laissez-faire, “oh that’ll do” approach that’s created a bit of a vacuum for more unprofessional stuff to happen compared to the past. People I speak to internally now regard the Channel as a bit of a joke and on a fairly regular basis you see that attitude seeping onto the screen.


RE: BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) - London Lite - 07-12-2023

It's a blooper, nothing more.

The 'outrage' from certain posters about a split second joke meant for the gallery is way over the top.


RE: BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) - ginnyfan - 07-12-2023

I don't know if she wanted to go viral with some of those previous little things she did at the end of bulletins, there are many You Tube clips of them. It's nothing bad or wrong, clearly many presenters like to have some harmless fun at the end, though some of Maryam's are a bit cringy. So it's just my conclusion that she wanted to go viral or draw attention, since she did not do these things before, as far I know.


RE: BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) - Skygeek - 07-12-2023

(07-12-2023, 01:49 PM)leewilliams Wrote:  I’ll dare to tread a middle way here.

Calls for Maryam to be suspended (or worse) are clearly way over the top - a reminder from a manager about expected studio etiquette will suffice.

But sticking a finger up at a camera in a live studio speaks to something I’ve written about here before - a general impression that ever since the changes, the NC’s adopted this laissez-faire, “oh that’ll do” approach that’s created a bit of a vacuum for more unprofessional stuff to happen compared to the past. People I speak to internally now regard the Channel as a bit of a joke and on a fairly regular basis you see that attitude seeping onto the screen.

She shouldn't have done it - but what is there to say beyond that that doesn't groundlessly assassinate the character of a presenter that the people doing so have likely never met?

I guess that's my overall point.


RE: BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) - South - 07-12-2023

I think any reprimand should be a matter for the HR team at the BBC, rather than ourselves. We need to entrust that a suitable reprimand is provided with a reminder of professional standards and that should then be the end of the matter. Overall its a bit of a storm in a teacup, which has probably only been exaggerated due to ill feeling regarding the 'missing' presenters.


RE: BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) - matthieu1221 - 07-12-2023

(07-12-2023, 12:15 PM)Skygeek Wrote:  How - objectively - do you know that "she wanted that viral moment"?

Go on... how?

And while you're occupying the inside of her head, perhaps you could give us other profound insights like whether she likes sugar in her tea or not.

Reactions like this are why on-air people often end up hating being in the public eye. Reactionary tosh devoid of any intellectual merit.

Probably why there's such lack of levity nowadays on the BBC. Damned if they do anything deemed too much of a stretch from simply reading the autocue. Heck even Victoria's farewell got complaints here iirc.


RE: BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) - aaron_scotland - 07-12-2023

From Twitter, though he has since deleted his tweets

"Robert Coxwell, a photographer and journalist, wrote on X that he was the gallery producer for the show and said it was “regrettable” that someone had “found the need to amplify it”, adding that only two people on X had noticed but it “went largely ignored for 10 hours. Until someone went on to a BBC system, clipped it up and sent it out.”

Coxwell said it had been taken from an internal archive system called Autorot, adding: “Luckily Autorot provides a log of who did what because it triggers an email to say the clip they wanted is ready to be downloaded.”

He then tweeted: “I am so deep into the workings of Autorot I can’t tell you. Christmas could be coming early for someone!”"

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/dec/07/bbc-presenter-apologises-after-giving-middle-finger-at-start-of-live-broadcast 


Does that last sentence imply he is trying to sack the person who 'leaked' it when it went out on air? This seems very weird. The person getting punished should be the one messing around infront of tv cameras.

It was clipped by really big Twitter users right after it happened, this whole 'only 2 people saw it' is just bonkers.


RE: BBC News Pres: Apr 2023 - Present (News Channel/BBC One) - interestednovice - 07-12-2023

(07-12-2023, 01:39 PM)ginnyfan Wrote:  I wouldn't put Simon's paper-tablet stunt in the same category as greeting your viewers with a middle finger. If this is supposed to be acceptable, and not cause ''outrage'' or fuss, then what's stopping Christian Fraser from mooning the viewers at the start of The Context tonight??? Maybe we should accept that as well, if it's just him having some fun, at work, with his colleagues. Rolleyes 

Once again, I don't think Moshiri should be fired, replaced or anything like that. Suspension or some sort of warning will probably happen since the story has gone international now and BBC is already under a lot of pressure from all sides. But there are certain rules and ways to behave at the work place, especially if you're working on tv and broadcasting to hundreds of thousands around the world. There is a special responsibility this job carries with it. Most news presentes seem to understand this.

I agree. It’s about professionalism at work, which seems to have gone out of the window here.

Even if not in an on-air role, I would expect a professional working environment where this sort of thing doesn’t happen - jokes allowed, yes, but not this in this sort of crass or vulgar way; and certainly not from an on-air “face” (they are held to higher standards); and certainly not in the studio; and certainly not on the air.

The “explanation”, frankly, just makes the whole thing even more bizarre. We are talking about an experienced news presenter. Somebody who would understand the golden rule to assume that cameras are always on and microphones are always live. The countdown from 10 to 1 is basically that the feed cuts to you in vision on 2 or 1 because the 0 is the cue to start reading the autocue. It also certainly was the case in the past, and I’m sure it still is, that the UK NC often cut in a second or two early as the two feeds synced together - UK NC feed being the output straight from the gallery, of course, and not via Red Bee.

Time was, a “harmless blooper” was Carole Walker’s handbag being left on the desk. This is far worse than that.

It’s not confected outrage, but Tomasz was suspended after his bloopers and moved to a back-office role for a time. Those saying this shouldn’t happen are showing that standards have, indeed, dropped since those days.

The reason many of us are not happy about this is that we do still watch and care about the NC, so to see further slides in quality is disappointing.