Posts: 3,865
Threads: 18
Likes Received: 6,295 in 2,035 posts
Likes Given: 2,854
Joined: Jul 2022
Well presumably only content verified to be true should be broadcast under the Verified Live brand, which makes carrying a live Trump speech, or any politician for that matter, under the brand difficult.
(This post was last modified: 31-05-2024, 04:09 PM by
Brekkie.)
Posts: 676
Threads: 8
Likes Received: 1,347 in 421 posts
Likes Given: 67
Joined: Jul 2022
It's interesting currently watching the Election Newscast on the News Channel. The current two-way only has one of them in vision.
I wonder if there's a case for BBC News visualising a few more of their podcasts, for showing at weekends and some evenings. It certainly feels more informative than the two hour long Context.
Formerly 'Charlie Wells' of TV Forum.
Posts: 937
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 1,770 in 474 posts
Likes Given: 1,110
Joined: Jul 2022
(31-05-2024, 04:03 PM)oscillon Wrote: Due to Trump making a statement, 4pm UKT TOTH is simulcast on both UK and World feeds, with Matthew Amroliwala from Studio E and generic BBC News branding (instead of Verified Live on the World feed).
I think World should just banish those branded shows in the afternoon, its not distinctive enough to be different and in Studio C its even worse.
Posts: 156
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 428 in 112 posts
Likes Given: 43
Joined: Jul 2022
I think it's been said before that the branded programmes might exist for the benefit of advertisers. Regardless, their existence isn't detrimental to the schedule and it would be rather pointless to ditch them. I agree though, that they don't offer anything different than a generic bulletin and they could desperately do with being 'beefed up' both in terms of presentation and editorially.
I do think the channel was at its worst last April when nearly every hour was plain BBC News. It's come along quite a bit since moving back into Studio E at the start of this month.
Something as simple as unique theme music and different camera angles as well as a focus on specific regions would go a long way in improving them I think.
Posts: 327
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 1,248 in 237 posts
Likes Given: 164
Joined: Aug 2022
(31-05-2024, 10:18 PM)MFTJA Wrote: I think it's been said before that the branded programmes might exist for the benefit of advertisers. Regardless, their existence isn't detrimental to the schedule and it would be rather pointless to ditch them. I agree though, that they don't offer anything different than a generic bulletin and they could desperately do with being 'beefed up' both in terms of presentation and editorially.
I do think the channel was at its worst last April when nearly every hour was plain BBC News. It's come along quite a bit since moving back into Studio E at the start of this month.
Something as simple as unique theme music and different camera angles as well as a focus on specific regions would go a long way in improving them I think.
Isn't your last paragraph pretty much what was in place with the World News branded programmes pre-merger?
But the decision was taken to axe all of the UK daytime WN branded programmes and start from scratch. It's questionable whether the replacements are any better.
Posts: 1,201
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 4,802 in 987 posts
Likes Given: 239
Joined: Aug 2022
(10 hours ago)Radio_man Wrote: Isn't your last paragraph pretty much what was in place with the World News branded programmes pre-merger?
But the decision was taken to axe all of the UK daytime WN branded programmes and start from scratch. It's questionable whether the replacements are any better.
Maybe a good few years ago, but most of the branded programmes had largely lost a strong regional/specific focus by even the time they were put on Covid hiatus. Largely a consequence of both the cuts and dropping the afternoon World News shift, which meant they became the sole news programmes for most of the 'daytime' and had to become more generalist.
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 18
Likes Received: 6,295 in 2,035 posts
Likes Given: 2,854
Joined: Jul 2022
I do think there is some value in having some key points in the schedule carry programme specific branding but when every block is branded just for the sake of being branded it devalues the parts of the schedule which warrant the specific branding in the first place.
Personally I think any branded strand should be different to what people would consider a "normal" hour on the news channel - so The Context has a format point which differentiates it from just rolling news. On the other hand Verified Live really doesn't.
Posts: 692
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 1,788 in 478 posts
Likes Given: 5,419
Joined: Oct 2022
But…but… it’s “three hours of developing stories and checking out the truth behind them”!
/sarcasm
Posts: 90
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 165 in 51 posts
Likes Given: 534
Joined: Oct 2022
(6 hours ago)Brekkie Wrote: I do think there is some value in having some key points in the schedule carry programme specific branding but when every block is branded just for the sake of being branded it devalues the parts of the schedule which warrant the specific branding in the first place.
Personally I think any branded strand should be different to what people would consider a "normal" hour on the news channel - so The Context has a format point which differentiates it from just rolling news. On the other hand Verified Live really doesn't.
Absolutely - Outside Source, (The) Context, (Beyond) 100 Days, World News America all make sense. Appointment to view to a greater or lesser extent. BBC News Now and Verified Live just seem silly.
I wonder how true the arguments about advertisers are? Would an international bank care if they’re in the ad break for BBC News Now?
Posts: 22
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 41 in 13 posts
Likes Given: 7
Joined: Jan 2023
Has Barbara Plett Usher moved permanently to Africa? I may have missed this but she was previously State Department Correspondent in Washington, D.C. but her Twitter account now says she is Africa Correspondent and is based in Nairobi - she is currently in South Africa reporting on the election.
If so, do we know if anyone has replaced her at the State Department?