10-03-2023, 08:43 PM
I did find this funny and nostalgic.
https://twitter.com/Flying_Inside/status/1634245780184637440
https://twitter.com/Flying_Inside/status/1634245780184637440
(10-03-2023, 08:38 PM)DavidWhitfield Wrote: twitter.com
So... was never meant to be part of it. Tweets to confirm that... he still won't be part of it. Seems like an utterly meaningless banwagon-jumping tweet.
On this basis, I'd just like to take this opportunity to confirm that I too, was not originally planned to be part of the presenting team of Match Of The Day tomorrow, and I am steadfast that I will continue to have no involvement in its production.
(10-03-2023, 08:38 PM)DavidWhitfield Wrote: twitter.comNot quite. There is currently a desperate scramble to find anyone to do tomorrow’s programme. There isn’t anyone who hasn’t been approached. More names to come out.
So... was never meant to be part of it. Tweets to confirm that... he still won't be part of it. Seems like an utterly meaningless banwagon-jumping tweet.
On this basis, I'd just like to take this opportunity to confirm that I too, was not originally planned to be part of the presenting team of Match Of The Day tomorrow, and I am steadfast that I will continue to have no involvement in its production.
(10-03-2023, 07:29 PM)DavidWhitfield Wrote: Is it a major story? The actual details of a government policy are of note. Gary Lineker's opinion of it, however, and whether the nature of his contract prohibits him from publicising his views either way, is of no consequence to me whatever. Sorry, I know everyone else seems to be terribly invested in all this, but I am struggling to care one iota about this 'major story' personally.
(10-03-2023, 08:46 PM)Nobby Wrote: At the time of writing Gary Lineker is shown as presenting Match of the Day tomorrow (www.bbc.co.uk ) and Mark Chapman is shown as presenting next week (www.bbc.co.uk ).
How long before a backlash against Mark Chapman for taking the thirty pieces of silver even though he was probably always down to present next week?
(10-03-2023, 08:47 PM)Brekkie Wrote:No it shows the need to act quicker when making these decisions. Suspending Gary is almost certainly the correct decision over those comments which go much further than reasonable criticism of the policy in question but by delaying the decision it has given those who dislike the government the opportunity to undermine it at the expense of the BBC’s reputation.(10-03-2023, 07:29 PM)DavidWhitfield Wrote: Is it a major story? The actual details of a government policy are of note. Gary Lineker's opinion of it, however, and whether the nature of his contract prohibits him from publicising his views either way, is of no consequence to me whatever. Sorry, I know everyone else seems to be terribly invested in all this, but I am struggling to care one iota about this 'major story' personally.
It wasn't a major story when they gave it undue prominence on Wednesday. Now it is a massive story - it shows that the BBC has lost it's independence and has bended to government pressure to take action against an employee who has been critical of government rhetoric.
This feels like a turning point - not for sports broadcasting but for the BBC and potentially the government too having overstretchd their reach.