11-05-2023, 10:56 PM
These things and styles generally round in circles and it may well be that we end up back at this sort of thing in due course:
www.youtube.com
After all there's only a finite way of presenting this sort of stuff, and it probably only needs somebody to break the mould and the rest will follow, with a limit - after all before Sky's relaunch of 2005 the whole thing (especially with breaking news) had become so over the top it was virtually insufferable.
But I dare say the underlying factor like most of these things is costs. After all presenters don't work for nothing, and why pay for two when one will do?
Re: AI newsreader, well could be interesting if one meets another one and you end up with this sort of thing:
www.youtube.com
www.youtube.com
After all there's only a finite way of presenting this sort of stuff, and it probably only needs somebody to break the mould and the rest will follow, with a limit - after all before Sky's relaunch of 2005 the whole thing (especially with breaking news) had become so over the top it was virtually insufferable.
But I dare say the underlying factor like most of these things is costs. After all presenters don't work for nothing, and why pay for two when one will do?
Re: AI newsreader, well could be interesting if one meets another one and you end up with this sort of thing:
www.youtube.com
![[-]](https://pres.cafe/images//collapse.png)