09-09-2023, 09:51 PM
It's like the bad old days where ideology was the key reason for hiring rather than their ability to present.
Quote:A couple of interviews have appeared that I assume must have been recorded in the new Westminster studios.
If Stewart’s interview with Camilla Tominey was recorded at the same time, I wonder if we may see the new set for the first time?
(09-09-2023, 07:11 PM)James Wrote: Admittedly, it was a questionable decision for them to rush Martin on air like thatYou’re telling me! You mention the quality of the BBC NC which has itself been questionable of late but nothing they’ve put out has looked this rank amateur.
(09-09-2023, 09:41 PM)leewilliams Wrote: Would any of GBN’s usual defenders here like to defend the standard of this?
(09-09-2023, 10:09 PM)AaronTV Wrote: Clearly the clip in isolation is not fantastic, but I find the relentless whinging about the channel, in place of actually discussing the presentation, so tiresome.
Whilst watching the clips this week of the moment news of the Queen’s death was announced on the different channels, I was struck by the blip ITV News had when the moment came - Mary built up to reading the statement, only for it not to be on the autocue, and to not have a paper copy either. After quite a few seconds it looks to have been relayed to her by earpiece and then read to us. Sky News didn’t have the statement ready as they announced the Queen’s passing either.
My point, therefore, is that mistakes happen - even when it really matters. No live TV channel is immune from them.
With the added context two posts above yours, the clip doesn’t seem so bad - this was not the moment the news was broken to viewers, as had been suggested. I highly suspect you didn’t check the context before commenting this.
The anchor from the following hour was put on air 10 minutes early and had probably not heard the actual news update itself. With that in mind, you can certainly see how it happened, although it’s clearly not fantastic.
More broadly, however, GB News exists, whether you like it or not - these kinds of passive aggressive comments are not going to change that.
(10-09-2023, 12:47 AM)bilky asko Wrote: Even with the context, that is an excruciating watch. Surely it's less excusable as the news has already broken?
(09-09-2023, 10:09 PM)AaronTV Wrote: Clearly the clip in isolation is not fantastic, but I find the relentless whinging about the channel, in place of actually discussing the presentation, so tiresome.With respect, I think it’s you who is allowing their political views and support for GBNews to cloud your judgement.
Whilst watching the clips this week of the moment news of the Queen’s death was announced on the different channels, I was struck by the blip ITV News had when the moment came - Mary built up to reading the statement, only for it not to be on the autocue, and to not have a paper copy either. After quite a few seconds it looks to have been relayed to her by earpiece and then read to us. Sky News didn’t have the statement ready as they announced the Queen’s passing either.
My point, therefore, is that mistakes happen - even when it really matters. No live TV channel is immune from them.
With the added context two posts above yours, the clip doesn’t seem so bad - this was not the moment the news was broken to viewers, as had been suggested. I highly suspect you didn’t check the context before commenting this.
The anchor from the following hour was put on air 10 minutes early and had probably not heard the actual news update itself. With that in mind, you can certainly see how it happened, although it’s clearly not fantastic.
More broadly, however, GB News exists, whether you like it or not - these kinds of passive aggressive comments are not going to change that.