Posts: 267
Threads: 18
Likes Received: 303 in 141 posts
Likes Given: 40
Joined: Jul 2022
(30-06-2024, 05:13 PM)Thomanory Wrote: W's YouTube channel is completely empty, yet they have 82K subscribers. At least for me.
Could have had videos that were privated?
Posts: 1,063
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 790 in 396 posts
Likes Given: 75
Joined: Jul 2022
Yeah, they've either hidden or deleted the content I'd assume.
Posts: 31
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 17 in 7 posts
Likes Given: 134
Joined: Jul 2022
The website has been updated with the U branding... Simular thing to what happened with ITVX.
Posts: 1,135
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 2,206 in 687 posts
Likes Given: 2,968
Joined: Jul 2022
(02-07-2024, 11:19 PM)GeeTeeKay474 Wrote: The website has been updated with the U branding... Simular thing to what happened with ITVX.
The big difference is that ITVX was just an extension to the existing ITV brand and style. It also didn't affect the names of the channels.
'U' is taking a wrecking ball to the existing UKTV brand and that of all their channels.
When one of your popular channels says "We know you'll still call us Dave", then you've accepted defeat before the starting gun was fired.
(This post was last modified:
Yesterday, 11:03 AM by
Stuart.)
Posts: 495
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 1,208 in 311 posts
Likes Given: 118
Joined: Aug 2022
Renaming one of the most successful TV brands in existence, Dave, to U&Dave, is as daft as say, renaming UK Gold to UKTV Go- oh wait.
Posts: 1,896
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 2,337 in 929 posts
Likes Given: 160
Joined: Jul 2022
(Yesterday, 11:10 AM)VMPhil Wrote: Renaming one of the most successful TV brands in existence, Dave, to U&Dave, is as daft as say, renaming UK Gold to UKTV Go- oh wait.
Or, even worse, Go On Laugh Daily.
Posts: 62
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 124 in 45 posts
Likes Given: 31
Joined: Jul 2022
It is slightly amusing that the way this rebrand has split poster views now seems to very closely match UKTV's scheduling.
90% repeats, 10% original content!
TV Whirl - Since 2001
Posts: 495
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 1,208 in 311 posts
Likes Given: 118
Joined: Aug 2022
(Yesterday, 11:49 AM)TesTVWhirl Wrote: It is slightly amusing that the way this rebrand has split poster views now seems to very closely match UKTV's scheduling.
90% repeats, 10% original content! ![Big Grin Big Grin](https://pres.cafe/images/smilies/biggrin.png)
Unfortunately, when a rebrand is this bad, it's hard not to express how bad it is. I think we've all been quite restrained, to be honest!
Posts: 94
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 334 in 57 posts
Likes Given: 76
Joined: Sep 2022
This must have been posted before but can’t help but feel if the marketing people had seen this before deciding on the U brand it wouldn’t be happeneing
youtu.be
Posts: 102
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 187 in 59 posts
Likes Given: 586
Joined: Oct 2022
(Yesterday, 11:49 AM)TesTVWhirl Wrote: It is slightly amusing that the way this rebrand has split poster views now seems to very closely match UKTV's scheduling.
90% repeats, 10% original content! ![Big Grin Big Grin](https://pres.cafe/images/smilies/biggrin.png)
I’d like to provide some of that original content that ‘u’ was also a sub-brand/tariff from BT Cellnet in the 90s. They even had the brand on some of their phones (see
www.modip.ac.uk ). It led to them making lots of puns, if you can call them that, like ‘All about U’ being a title of the manual/tariff guide (?).
I expect some similar references in ‘U’s marketing?