26-08-2022, 01:19 PM
(26-08-2022, 09:24 AM)DTV Wrote:(26-08-2022, 08:28 AM)Steve in Pudsey Wrote:(25-08-2022, 08:48 PM)DTV Wrote: It might not be optimal presentation-wise, but when your choice is between something and nothing, you don't get picky about how the something is presented.
This is a service that license holders pay for, not scraps from the table that we should be grateful for what we get.
But again this is just hyberbole. Visualised radio might no be optimal, but it isn't the end of the world. Some people seem to imagine it consists of televising those old studio webcams, when it involves multiple eye-level cameras, with studios smartened up with some LED lighting and a few screens. Sure it's not Studio E, but if you can't watch the news because there's a radio mic there, that feels like a you problem.
Thanks for that rant, which is a hell of a leap from what I actually said. I was simply expressing an opinion that your suggestion that beggars can't be choosers is not valid in this context.
But to address your point, it's a lot more about the news packages than the studio presentation. TV is not just radio with pictures, and producing packages as such can mean a compromised experience for both audiences.