10-03-2023, 02:20 AM
(10-03-2023, 12:40 AM)Scratch_Perry Wrote:If they really are doing that, that is really wacky.(09-03-2023, 11:49 PM)interestednovice Wrote: I agree that the original concept of Outside Source, ironically, was far more innovative. It also fit the name far better.
On the point about context to news for World viewers: good point, however to an extent the reverse it also true - British viewers will be irritated by constant explanations of where Warwickshire is and how the “UK Finance Minister” is called the Chancellor, so will quickly switch away if things get too international. This is party what I meant before when I was saying that it’s impossible to satisfy both audiences. Financially, the WN audience is by far the most important but the BBC must also be seen to do enough for British viewers by Ofcom and the press, so it has no choice really but the unsatisfying fudge we are now seeing.
There is nothing wrong with “proper” WN if that’s what the audience is expecting, though. But it wouldn’t allow the BBC to claim that it’s “not closing the NC”!
Or the Home Secretary being called the "UK Interior Minister"...
I don't think other international news channels (never recalled it being the case on CNN for instance), or even many domestic news channels abroad which change around the titles unless it's a translation. Same goes for the Chancellor of the Exchequer.