[Stockland Hillman]

it’s incredibly easy to make hundreds of millions of pounds worth of cuts if you’re not the person who actually has do it. If you insist it’s all mismanagement and your superior expert handling of the situation could save Newsnight, local radio and the news channel you’re going to have to be way more specific than just throwing out general whataboutisms. Because at the minute you sound like boomers, with their good old fashioned British common, sense telling lazy snowflake millennials they could in fact afford a house if they gave up Netflix and Starbucks.

Lol.  Nonsense. Let me help you out:

ChatGPT  'Rewrite The following,  removing trite clichés about boomers, snowflakes  and British values to make an intelligent post of 2 paragraphs max'

Here ya go:
Making substantial financial cuts is no small feat, especially if you're not the one executing them. Claiming issues stem solely from mismanagement and asserting that your expertise could salvage essential media outlets requires a detailed plan rather than vague critiques. Without specifics, it's akin to suggesting that by merely cutting minor luxuries, one could overcome significant economic challenges

Best learn basic writing and reasoning skills before bitching in public about other peoples comments.  See, the AI version makes such a better value contribution. 

Now to the substance of ChatGPTs argument,  I would say look at the NAO dataset and  explain why you CAN'T find savings and relocations in £5.7 billion of spend, given the fact their are widely known comparators and metrics that highlight deviations from the norm.