14-07-2023, 01:34 PM
(14-07-2023, 01:26 PM)KrazyKei Wrote: It's very easy to define alternative views as 'extreme right'. Yet I don't see anyone explaining why they are 'extreme right'.
I don't need to define what views puts someone in a particular spot on the scale of political views. A lot of very clever people do that work, including comparisons between different countries.
If 88% of the UK population feels that gay marriages are as "normal" as opposite sex marriages then the 12% who don't hold that view that sit very much at the extreme right of scale. If 79% believe that we should welcome genuine refugees and 21% don't then the same applied. Similarly, if 86% believe in universal health care which publicly funded and free at the point of use, then 14% hold views which go towards the far right of the scale.
Those numbers by the way are not made up.
(14-07-2023, 01:30 PM)KrazyKei Wrote: Am I to take it that because of the aforementioned platforms in the first paragraph that we should be grateful for them and not have a TV channel platform for this country?
Are you tarring me with the same brush with those you claim have no room for facts? I think you should look at my past posts to back up your claim.
I am highlighting that you have claimed something as fact which is pushed out by GBN and friends but is not reflected in reality. I don't have the time to look at your previous posts and I don't need to. If you usually look into claims being made by someone and make up your own mind based on your findings of fact, then great. If you don't then there is nothing I can (or want to) do about it. I make no judgment about anyone's views.