27-07-2023, 03:27 PM
(27-07-2023, 03:18 PM)Stockland Hillman Wrote: And here we have a classic case study in partisan agendas and misinformation.Oh well, my researched, factually correct evidence, has been removed by the mods.
- Respected scientific organisation published data that was open to misinterpretation, that had a clarification issued (as a responsible org would)
- Clickbait driven media jump on the reports, catastrophe drives SEO Result via increased shares and engagement. [Happens regardless of topics, from a minor planned TV schedule change being 'x show cancelled' to more important topics]
- Partisan actors use story to push there own agendas
- Claims on both sides prove to be inaccurate and misrepresented. Real people loose out on accurate news on important topics
Will Neil Oliver on GB News correct his false claim that temperatures won't go above 40? And that there are record temps in Europe? Will the the BBC Weather team who "corrected" the claims about using land not air temps, acknowledge the source of the confusion, that is was widely reported by media outlets and was also a misleading and wrong use of data? I doubt either would happen.
Except he's not.
He's examining facts that led a broadcaster to make a claim in its content that another broadcaster to comment.