04-03-2024, 01:14 PM
There are continual references to not being able to comment regarding an 'employment' situation that kept GBNews from making certain elements of this public until 1st March, I presume that's the situation here.
It makes for interesting reading, certainly - both sides accounts don't tally with one another, Dan apparently saying they didn't tell him to apologise immediately at the time (one might say that someone that heavily involved in the world of broadcasting shouldn't need nudging, but that's by the by). GB News on the other hand saying they had a wording prepared that he refused to deliver. Hard to rationalise it other than "one side is lying to throw the other under the bus", but which?
It makes for interesting reading, certainly - both sides accounts don't tally with one another, Dan apparently saying they didn't tell him to apologise immediately at the time (one might say that someone that heavily involved in the world of broadcasting shouldn't need nudging, but that's by the by). GB News on the other hand saying they had a wording prepared that he refused to deliver. Hard to rationalise it other than "one side is lying to throw the other under the bus", but which?