Posts: 819
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 1,773 in 519 posts
Likes Given: 931
Joined: Aug 2022
(10-03-2023, 06:02 PM)Transmission Wrote: Just outrageous. I love the BBC, but I really can't defend this, especially with Richard Sharp not "stepping back" as chairman. The Attenborough news today doesn't help, either.
I wouldn't blame whoever steps in as presenter tomorrow, but I'd like to hope people might want to show some solidarity and not do it.
Well if no one else will do it, old Dickie Sharp himself can always step in, seeing as he’s so capable and talented…
Joking aside, there was absolutely no need for it to come to this. Why even make a big deal about it? Lineker has been making political comments for years and the BBC never seemed bothered before. And as other journalists pointed out, Andrew Neil (whom I greatly respect as an interviewer) gave many, many opinions on politics
whilst he was leading their political coverage! As do some other BBC journos, like Justin Webb. There seems to be a massive double standard at work.
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2023, 06:11 PM by
Kojak.)
Posts: 467
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 485 in 213 posts
Likes Given: 91
Joined: Jul 2022
I think Richard Osman sums it up pretty well, it's a pathetic state of affairs and this is now such a mess that it'll probably only be untangled when Gary Lineker decides to leave the BBC. There's not really any other way to back out of this.
I'm a huge supporter of the BBC, but they really don't help themselves in situations like this. It'll no doubt be leading the news headlines this evening etc.
Posts: 554
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 740 in 386 posts
Likes Given: 1,293
Joined: Oct 2022
(10-03-2023, 06:10 PM)Kojak Wrote: (10-03-2023, 06:02 PM)Transmission Wrote: Just outrageous. I love the BBC, but I really can't defend this, especially with Richard Sharp not "stepping back" as chairman. The Attenborough news today doesn't help, either.
I wouldn't blame whoever steps in as presenter tomorrow, but I'd like to hope people might want to show some solidarity and not do it.
Well if no one else will do it, old Dickie Sharp himself can always step in, seeing as he’s so capable and talented…
Joking aside, there was absolutely no need for it to come to this. Why even make a big deal about it? Lineker has been making political comments for years and the BBC never seemed bothered before. And as other journalists pointed out, Andrew Neil (whom I greatly respect as an interviewer) gave many, many opinions on politics whilst he was leading their political coverage! As do some other BBC journos, like Justin Webb. There seems to be a massive double standard at work.
One might argue that times are changing and that the BBC's independence doesn't seem as high on this government's agenda as under previous governments.
It might not be outright control of output, but the government is effectively pushing for self-censorship which in effect is the same thing. And not even on content, but on employees' (who have nothing to do with news coverage!) personal political opinions.
EDIT: today's Attenborough story is in effect self-censorship on content
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2023, 06:14 PM by
matthieu1221.)
Posts: 244
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 367 in 134 posts
Likes Given: 4
Joined: Sep 2022
Wonder if this will make ITV 'sit' on Sitting On A Fortune Series 2 a bit longer...
Posts: 114
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 255 in 73 posts
Likes Given: 3
Joined: Aug 2022
(10-03-2023, 06:13 PM)matthieu1221 Wrote: (10-03-2023, 06:10 PM)Kojak Wrote: Well if no one else will do it, old Dickie Sharp himself can always step in, seeing as he’s so capable and talented…
Joking aside, there was absolutely no need for it to come to this. Why even make a big deal about it? Lineker has been making political comments for years and the BBC never seemed bothered before. And as other journalists pointed out, Andrew Neil (whom I greatly respect as an interviewer) gave many, many opinions on politics whilst he was leading their political coverage! As do some other BBC journos, like Justin Webb. There seems to be a massive double standard at work.
One might argue that times are changing and that the BBC's independence doesn't seem as high on this government's agenda as under previous governments.
It might not be outright control of output, but the government is effectively pushing for self-censorship which in effect is the same thing. And not even on content, but on employees' (who have nothing to do with news coverage!) personal political opinions.
EDIT: today's Attenborough story is in effect self-censorship on content
The Attenborough story that is in actual fact fake news?
Actually it is rather worrying that a supposedly impartial organisation such as the BBC would consider content made by a campaigning organisation such as the WWF to be an appropriate acquisition even if only for iPlayer.
Posts: 461
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 915 in 272 posts
Likes Given: 472
Joined: Jul 2022
Do we know if the Attenborough story is even true? As someone said above, there is some disagreement as to whether it was only acquired for iPlayer in the first place...
Posts: 568
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 321 in 173 posts
Likes Given: 37
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 637
Threads: 9
Likes Received: 816 in 295 posts
Likes Given: 194
Joined: Jul 2022
He would work well on GMB I think.
Posts: 333
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 503 in 193 posts
Likes Given: 94
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 467
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 485 in 213 posts
Likes Given: 91
Joined: Jul 2022
Let's be honest - ITV or News UK will be very very happy to accommodate him.
ITV like above, or News UK would happily have him front talkSPORT Football coverage and probably give him a slot on TalkTV while encouraging him to share his views!