Gary Lineker/BBC Asylum Controversy

(10-03-2023, 06:02 PM)Transmission Wrote:  Just outrageous. I love the BBC, but I really can't defend this, especially with Richard Sharp not "stepping back" as chairman. The Attenborough news today doesn't help, either.

I wouldn't blame whoever steps in as presenter tomorrow, but I'd like to hope people might want to show some solidarity and not do it.
Well if no one else will do it, old Dickie Sharp himself can always step in, seeing as he’s so capable and talented… 

Joking aside, there was absolutely no need for it to come to this. Why even make a big deal about it? Lineker has been making political comments for years and the BBC never seemed bothered before. And as other journalists pointed out, Andrew Neil (whom I greatly respect as an interviewer) gave many, many opinions on politics whilst he was leading their political coverage! As do some other BBC journos, like Justin Webb. There seems to be a massive double standard at work.
[-] The following 8 users Like Kojak's post:
  • Alf Stewart, Frances, IanJRedman, Ma76, Nige, thePineapple, Transmission, Will
Reply

I think Richard Osman sums it up pretty well, it's a pathetic state of affairs and this is now such a mess that it'll probably only be untangled when Gary Lineker decides to leave the BBC. There's not really any other way to back out of this.

I'm a huge supporter of the BBC, but they really don't help themselves in situations like this. It'll no doubt be leading the news headlines this evening etc.
[-] The following 8 users Like Ash101's post:
  • IanJRedman, Larry the Loafer, Ma76, Newsroom, Nige, nwtv2003, UTVLifer, Yorksman
Reply

(10-03-2023, 06:10 PM)Kojak Wrote:  
(10-03-2023, 06:02 PM)Transmission Wrote:  Just outrageous. I love the BBC, but I really can't defend this, especially with Richard Sharp not "stepping back" as chairman. The Attenborough news today doesn't help, either.

I wouldn't blame whoever steps in as presenter tomorrow, but I'd like to hope people might want to show some solidarity and not do it.
Well if no one else will do it, old Dickie Sharp himself can always step in, seeing as he’s so capable and talented… 

Joking aside, there was absolutely no need for it to come to this. Why even make a big deal about it? Lineker has been making political comments for years and the BBC never seemed bothered before. And as other journalists pointed out, Andrew Neil (whom I greatly respect as an interviewer) gave many, many opinions on politics whilst he was leading their political coverage! As do some other BBC journos, like Justin Webb. There seems to be a massive double standard at work.

One might argue that times are changing and that the BBC's independence doesn't seem as high on this government's agenda as under previous governments.

It might not be outright control of output, but the government is effectively pushing for self-censorship which in effect is the same thing. And not even on content, but on employees' (who have nothing to do with news coverage!) personal political opinions.

EDIT: today's Attenborough story is in effect self-censorship on content
[-] The following 1 user Likes matthieu1221's post:
  • thePineapple
Reply

Wonder if this will make ITV 'sit' on Sitting On A Fortune Series 2 a bit longer...
Reply

(10-03-2023, 06:13 PM)matthieu1221 Wrote:  
(10-03-2023, 06:10 PM)Kojak Wrote:  Well if no one else will do it, old Dickie Sharp himself can always step in, seeing as he’s so capable and talented… 

Joking aside, there was absolutely no need for it to come to this. Why even make a big deal about it? Lineker has been making political comments for years and the BBC never seemed bothered before. And as other journalists pointed out, Andrew Neil (whom I greatly respect as an interviewer) gave many, many opinions on politics whilst he was leading their political coverage! As do some other BBC journos, like Justin Webb. There seems to be a massive double standard at work.

One might argue that times are changing and that the BBC's independence doesn't seem as high on this government's agenda as under previous governments.

It might not be outright control of output, but the government is effectively pushing for self-censorship which in effect is the same thing. And not even on content, but on employees' (who have nothing to do with news coverage!) personal political opinions.

EDIT: today's Attenborough story is in effect self-censorship on content
The Attenborough story that is in actual fact fake news?
Actually it is rather worrying that a supposedly impartial organisation such as the BBC would consider content made by a campaigning organisation such as the WWF to be an appropriate acquisition even if only for iPlayer.
[-] The following 2 users Like qwerty123's post:
  • interestednovice, thomash79
Reply

Do we know if the Attenborough story is even true? As someone said above, there is some disagreement as to whether it was only acquired for iPlayer in the first place...
[-] The following 5 users Like IanJRedman's post:
  • interestednovice, Ma76, Nige, thePineapple, thomash79
Reply

twitter.com 
[-] The following 2 users Like Newshound47's post:
  • interestednovice, thePineapple
Reply

He would work well on GMB I think.
[-] The following 3 users Like eyeTV's post:
  • interestednovice, Ma76, Spencer
Reply

twitter.com 
[-] The following 6 users Like nwtv2003's post:
  • Alf Stewart, IanJRedman, Ma76, matthieu1221, Newsroom, Spencer
Reply

Let's be honest - ITV or News UK will be very very happy to accommodate him.

ITV like above, or News UK would happily have him front talkSPORT Football coverage and probably give him a slot on TalkTV while encouraging him to share his views!
[-] The following 2 users Like Ash101's post:
  • Alf Stewart, interestednovice
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)