11-03-2023, 03:56 PM
(11-03-2023, 03:55 PM)Kim Wexler’s Ponytail Wrote:Because it's not the correct opinion, that's why.(11-03-2023, 03:36 PM)Stockland Hillman Wrote: He was publisher, not editor of Spectator, which itself is a magazine regulated by IPSO. Therefore nothing like the Lineker situation
It's widely accepted that Journalists write and work for other news organisations of similar standing - so and independently regulated news magazine wouldn't raise any issues, same working for another Ofcom regulated broadcaster
It seems like we're holding a BBC sports presenter to a higher standard than actual BBC journalists here. The political journalist could express his non impartial opinions on twitter because he also wrote for another news organisation but the Match of the Day presenter absolutely can't express a non-impartial opinion on twitter because.....????
(11-03-2023, 03:52 PM)Stockland Hillman Wrote: This what I mean when I say there's a highly manipulated agenda here.I agree that Campbell's comment is probably an overreaction - but Dan Hodges is about as much of a Labour supporter as Nigel Farage.
Labour commentator Dan Hodges is bang on here
The abolition of the BBC Singers is the latest thing to be the equivalent of the Nazis. Come on. Everyone needs to get a serious grip. This is getting ridiculous now. <a href="https://t.co/b97016vJ3J">https://t.co/b97016vJ3J</a></p>— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges)