[DTV]

But its not 'debatable' in law.  For a large organisation the job specification,  scoring criteria,  interview questions would all be designed to ensure a fair process. Having  favorites that we're 'tipped off' they would get the jobs is the antithesis of a fair process.

I was referring to the talents of the presenters as to what was debateable, and that absolutely is as it is somewhat subjective. Unless the losing presenters can provide hard proof that the winning presenters were 'tipped off' or chosen beforehand, BBC executives can simply hide behind such subjectivity.

I mean, to play devil's advocate, you could even suggest the fact that the most senior WN/NC presenters were chosen shows a reasonably fair process as you'd sure hope that you had already given your most prestigious channel presenting jobs to your best presenters.