[Stooky Bill]

Citation required, as they say. Why is it not reliable?

We discourage citing sources such as Wikipedia as definitive, for obvious reasons. Does TV Zone have a reputation for providing inaccurate/misleading information?

'Citation' is exactly the problem, as a website it has none. Lots of stuff ripped off from other sources with no credit or citation as to where. The nearest thing is the message 'Any copyright infringement is unintentional' at the bottom. They might not intend it but it definately is, and putting that doesn't excuse them either.

There's no bylines, no indication of who edits, owns or is responsible for the site. The only information is a generic outlook.com address aka Hotmail. No one trusts Hotmail addresses

Misleading it might not be, but quality and rekiable it definately isn't. It's no better than an AI clickbait aggregator.... in fact it probaly is


Obviously your site, your rules - but Wikipedia is a site that actively insists on citations and references for its content. Misinformation is flagged and/or removed. Authors and editors are all named, it's very transparent. Why you'd trust a site like TV Zone and not Wikipedia is beyond me.