21-05-2023, 03:40 PM
The set design for 12 at 12 looks like it should be a really fun game, but it really isn’t.
It offers the least exciting gamble in TV which, seems to be a no brainer considering the risk vs reward and they already have 6 grand safe and the few times I’ve seen it hardly anyone goes for it.
It would make more sense if they won a guaranteed £1,000 for getting through and they can open as many doors as they like but each time they’re gambling on not hitting a booby trap which would cost them the additional money up to 12k. I’m sure it’s similar to many other things such as Strike It Lucky, but it would make better television. It’s very anticlimactic, it’s like starting Millionaire with the question for one for a Million then 14 more for 5 grand a time.
It offers the least exciting gamble in TV which, seems to be a no brainer considering the risk vs reward and they already have 6 grand safe and the few times I’ve seen it hardly anyone goes for it.
It would make more sense if they won a guaranteed £1,000 for getting through and they can open as many doors as they like but each time they’re gambling on not hitting a booby trap which would cost them the additional money up to 12k. I’m sure it’s similar to many other things such as Strike It Lucky, but it would make better television. It’s very anticlimactic, it’s like starting Millionaire with the question for one for a Million then 14 more for 5 grand a time.
![[-]](https://pres.cafe/images//collapse.png)