17-04-2024, 08:39 PM
(17-04-2024, 08:37 PM)chaose Wrote: Wasn't that exactly why it was replaced?
The 1997 logo really shines when it's nice and big. But in smaller digital applications, the new version is much more legible.
No, it was replaced because someone decided that the Reith font needed to be used in the logo.
It is objectively not more legible at smaller sizes, because the letters in the boxes are much smaller. Therefore reducing the new logo to smaller sizes makes it harder to read than the old logo.