[IanJRedman]

Today's programme doesn't seem to be on iPlayer yet, do we know if there's any particular reason?

Odd - live programmes can sometimes take quite a while to encode, but not three hours...?

[oscillon]

Today's programme doesn't seem to be on iPlayer yet, do we know if there's any particular reason?

Odd - live programmes can sometimes take quite a while to encode, but not three hours...?

Today's show is now on iPlayer
www.bbc.co.uk 

BBC iPlayer - Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg - Can politicians show the economy is…
Laura Kuenssberg looks at the budget and the row over Gary Lineker.
  Source: www.bbc.co.uk

By the way, News Channel opted out at 09:59 today as the show slightly overran, but without any stinger, just straight cut to the countdown.

[bilky asko]

Odd - live programmes can sometimes take quite a while to encode, but not three hours...?

Today's show is now on iPlayer
www.bbc.co.uk 

By the way, News Channel opted out at 09:59 today as the show slightly overran, but without any stinger, just straight cut to the countdown.

With the endcap edited on at the end, perhaps explaining the delay.

[UTVLifer]

Write up and behind the scenes photos from the designers who did the brand design for Sunday for LK
twitter.com 

[Newsroom]

Back to the actual programme.

It's become a load of sh**e!

The guests are second rate, the abysmal two min interviews with celebrities are few and far between and ultimately I want to pull the lever downwards = BIN

Compare it to Sophie Ridge and it's doggy doo on your shoe.

Just awful.

[oscillon]

During the NC simulcast today the DOG was a bit of a mishmash - while the lower thirds were done in the NC style, the location DOG that appeared towards the end was taken from BBC One broadcast in a LK-style.

May be it was due to the fact that the interview was not live and NC does not usualy show any DOG in this case.

[Admin PC]

To the small group of individuals who seem to relish hurling insults at each other - please make the now deleted exchanges in this thread the last example of that.

[chris]

Have there been some changes recently? Watching for the first time this morning and noticed the catwalk seems to be extended. Some different shots this morning too that look like they might not be from the fixed camera positions?

Edit: is there a jib now?

Edit 2: talking nonsense. Catwalk has been like that since launch, no jib. Must have been different use of the cameras (perhaps manual rather than automated?)

[Randomuser123]

Have there been some changes recently? Watching for the first time this morning and noticed the catwalk seems to be extended. Some different shots this morning too that look like they might not be from the fixed camera positions?

Edit: is there a jib now?

Edit 2: talking nonsense. Catwalk has been like that since launch, no jib. Must have been different use of the cameras (perhaps manual rather than automated?)

Came here to ask this. There were a few shows today that just seemed too dynamic for the daleks, and also they had a bit of shake to them.

If it is a jib, while it’s not a lot/material amount of money, one person for one shift plus the studio setup, I’m just not sure what it really adds. And at a time of “we must save money” not sure it really adds to a pretty capable (if not to everyone’s taste) fully automated studio.

[Critique]

There was definitely a manual camera op (perhaps a steadicam?) in the studio today - some of the shots were in places that the robotic cameras couldn’t reach (such as on the rostrum or under the stairs). It made things look a little more dynamic as you’re not relying on the same set of shots, but equally doesn’t seem the most necessary of expenses.

Edit: Looking on iPlayer, they’ve had a manual camera op in the studio for a good few weeks now - almost certainly a steadicam based on some of the shots they’ve used. Pleased to report they’re nothing like the awful steadicam shots you used to get on World Have Your Say!