[Jsnbts]

Does Sky Stream provide Sky with more possibilities in what can be delivered, in a much quicker and more seamless way? For example - if they wanted to introduce a more traditional recording capability to Stream/Glass, could they not just update the software and provide cloud storage, with shows recorded remotely directly to the cloud? They could even offer different tiers of storage to purchase, like Apple does with iCloud.

I'm sure I've made that way too simplistic, but the Sky Stream box just acts as a physical gateway to the software now, doesn't it? I presume the boxes would be updated over time with faster processors and things, but the real wizardry surely sits with the software and online capabilities that can be added to over time.

I have to say my biggest concern with moving to Sky Stream was the lack of traditional recording but after having had it for a good few months now I've realised that apart from a slightly different change in mindset (using playlists etc.), it's almost the same experience as Sky Q, and an excellent product overall.