[Blubatt]

It's not like the old logo was visually inspired either. It's certainly modern and follows modern trends. The fact it's not a perfect circle does help, but the typeface is passively modern (New Pres Term- Passively Modern: not meant to draw attention but to fit into current trends)

---

A shame to see a solid logo which rooted back 53 years replaced with... this.

I like the old ITN logo and all, but...really? As I said, that logo wasn't really good either. It was too solid and if you shrunk it, the gaps would vanish. The 2006 modernisation just looked ugly. I think that its an improvement, personally.