07-06-2023, 02:22 PM
(07-06-2023, 10:04 AM)Pips2022 Wrote: The difference (of course) is there wasn’t social media to mock it mercilessly in the early 2000s. I think the Sky News bosses may have been a bit naive….and I find the David Platt lookalike quite brand eroding for Sky.
Does that mean they should decide their coverage based on Twitter reaction and the amateur news editors on there? They basically just had someone read Harry's evidence out loud, rather than dramatise the entire thing. I think it's good - back to the days when Sky used to try and go things a bit differently and just go for it with an idea.