Posts: 268
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 516 in 156 posts
Likes Given: 97
Joined: Jul 2022
(07-04-2023, 03:59 PM)Andrew Wrote: A ridiculous gear change just then on BBC News
They broke the news of the death of Paul Catermole from S Club 7, and then went straight into a ridiculous regional news story about a group of people who meet up to laugh with the clip consisting of basically 1 minute of continuous laughing.
It's not even on the ticker/flipper because of course that is still broken. Im sure even GB News would have fixed things by now.
Posts: 16
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 18 in 10 posts
Likes Given: 3
Joined: Feb 2023
(07-04-2023, 03:59 PM)Andrew Wrote: A ridiculous gear change just then on BBC News
They broke the news of the death of Paul Catermole from S Club 7, and then went straight into a ridiculous regional news story about a group of people who meet up to laugh with the clip consisting of basically 1 minute of continuous laughing.
Which is better covered by a UK opt out because it causing a explain things to international viewers. Through I think there is some in the world that may know who S Club 7 is.
Posts: 277
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 215 in 118 posts
Likes Given: 223
Joined: Jul 2022
The break playouts will be pre-determined probably. I agree that is not ideal if a news story like that breaks.
Posts: 188
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 589 in 126 posts
Likes Given: 106
Joined: Jul 2022
(07-04-2023, 04:56 PM)StreamingTV Wrote: (07-04-2023, 03:59 PM)Andrew Wrote: A ridiculous gear change just then on BBC News
They broke the news of the death of Paul Catermole from S Club 7, and then went straight into a ridiculous regional news story about a group of people who meet up to laugh with the clip consisting of basically 1 minute of continuous laughing.
Which is better covered by a UK opt out because it causing an explain things to international viewers. Through I think there is some in the world that may know who S Club 7 is.
There was a perfect opportunity for world to go to a break and then Matthew could have delivered the breaking news which was more appropriate for the UK audience.
Posts: 371
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 1,374 in 287 posts
Likes Given: 76
Joined: Jul 2022
It seems the ditching of the ticker is intentional rather than caused by technical problems. Looks like the ticker will not return as implied by this tweet:
twitter.com
(This post was last modified: 07-04-2023, 05:17 PM by
ALV.)
Posts: 95
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 214 in 67 posts
Likes Given: 298
Joined: Oct 2022
(07-04-2023, 05:16 PM)ALV Wrote: It seems the ditching of the ticker is intentional rather than caused by technical problems. Looks like the ticker will not return as implied by this tweet:
twitter.com
It's an interesting choice of image for him to make that point, as the ticker *is* clearly legible in that photo. I understand the overarching point - but it doesn't really apply in this setting. If somebody is watching on a mobile and is unable to make out the ticker, they will ignore it. However, it's of great importance to those watching on larger screens who are still a large majority of the audience.
The following 12 users Like strollfan's post:12 users Like strollfan's post
• AIB01WB, bkman1990, chrisherald, fanoftv, Frances, insert_good_username_here, James, Jayesyn, Jeff, LDN, Reith85, SuperSajuuk
Posts: 1,762
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 2,159 in 857 posts
Likes Given: 154
Joined: Jul 2022
If it's so illegible and pointless, then why even keep it there with the website address which supposedly nobody will be able to read either? May as well just get rid of the banner entirely and free up the screen space, that really is pointless.
(This post was last modified: 07-04-2023, 05:32 PM by
James2001.)
The following 20 users Like James2001's post:20 users Like James2001's post
• AIB01WB, bkman1990, chaose, chris, Frances, freeaxe, harshy, Ittr, James, Jayesyn, Jeff, JJJJ, Juicy Joe, LDN, Quantum+83, radiorebel, Reith85, SuperSajuuk, Telefunken, TVFan
Posts: 6
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 25 in 4 posts
Likes Given: 18
Joined: Oct 2022
The thing that confuses me is the fact that over time, mobile phone screens have actually gotten larger - so really the issue of legibility is less of a problem (as mentioned, the tweet shows the ticker is perfectly legible). I also don't think that future proofing should get in the way of still providing for TV - at the end of the day, it's still a TV news service as well as being available on mobile, etc and it shouldn't be ignored.
The following 15 users Like newsdesk's post:15 users Like newsdesk's post
• AIB01WB, bkman1990, chaose, chrisherald, fanoftv, Frances, freeaxe, insert_good_username_here, Ittr, James, Jeff, oscillon, Quantum+83, Reith85, SuperSajuuk
Posts: 1,762
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 2,159 in 857 posts
Likes Given: 154
Joined: Jul 2022
(07-04-2023, 05:35 PM)newsdesk Wrote: The thing that confuses me is the fact that over time, mobile phone screens have actually gotten larger - so really the issue of legibility is less of a problem (as mentioned, the tweet shows the ticker is perfectly legible). I also don't think that future proofing should get in the way of still providing for TV - at the end of the day, it's still a TV news service as well as being available on mobile, etc and it shouldn't be ignored.
And we've seen in the past what happens when how something works on mobile phones is places ahead of other mediums... it's how we ended up with the mess that was Windows 8!
Posts: 371
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 1,374 in 287 posts
Likes Given: 76
Joined: Jul 2022
I like how they're trying to be future proof by cutting back some graphical elements they deemed "legacy", BUT they're still stuck in the 4:3 safezone. Maybe removing that will give them more flexibility?
(Yes I know some providers still broadcast in 4:3, well in that case just letterbox the 16:9 feed...)